|
|
|
|
|
Terry Spear, Jeanne Clark, Mike Giusto, Neda
Khoshkebari, Michael Murphy and John Rush |
|
|
|
Bureau of Forensic Services Latent Print Unit |
|
& |
|
California Criminalistics Institute |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To evaluate the likelihood of obtaining
fingerprints & DNA profiles on cartridges that were handled before
being fired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartridges used in the study: |
|
22LR |
|
Brass |
|
Nickel |
|
9mmP |
|
Brass |
|
Nickel |
|
Aluminum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartridges used in the study: |
|
45ACP |
|
Brass |
|
Nickel |
|
Aluminum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three types of fingerprints were placed on
separate cartridges by three different people: |
|
Bloody |
|
Eccrine/sweat |
|
Oily |
|
Duplicate fingerprints were made so that similar
fired and unfired cartridges could be examined. |
|
The latent print-bearing samples consisted of 48
cartridges divided into two groups:
24 unfired cartridges & 24 fired cartridge cases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequence: |
|
Scribe reference line along cartridges side. |
|
Place print on cartridges on either side of
reference line |
|
Not likely to reflect conditions at crime scenes |
|
Fire one set of cartridges (N=24) through
weapon. |
|
Process fired and unfired (N=48)
cartridges/cases for fingerprints. |
|
Swab fired and unfired cartridges/cases for DNA
(N=48) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloody prints were evaluated and then processed
with amido black. |
|
Sweaty prints and oily prints were evaluated and
then processed with CAE fuming/Rhodamine 6G dye staining and visualized
with laser. |
|
Prints were ‘aged’ before processing for an
extended period of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloody Prints:
2/8 or 25% |
|
This type of print is not frequently encountered
on cartridges. |
|
Sweat Prints:
0/8 |
|
Delay between time print placed on cartridge and
processed for prints |
|
Oily Prints:
2/8 or 25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bloody Prints:
1/8 or 12.5% |
|
This type of print is not frequently encountered
on cartridges. |
|
Sweat Prints:
0/8 |
|
Delay between time print placed on cartridge and
processed for prints |
|
Oily Prints:
0/8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not likely |
|
If you eliminate bloody prints from
consideration, then only 3/32 [9%] cartridge cases displayed useable
prints. |
|
No useable prints were obtained on the cartridge
cases that had been fired. |
|
|
|
|
After cartridges processed for prints, the
fingerprints were swabbed with a swab dampened with deionized water. |
|
Swabs were organically extracted for DNA with
phenol-chloroform. |
|
Only DNA from bloody prints were quantitated
with QuantiBlot: No DNA detected |
|
All samples amplified with Applied Biosystem’s
Profiler Plus reagent kit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A total of 3 DNA profiles were obtained from the
48 cartridges/cases [6%] that were processed. |
|
All profiles were from bloody prints |
|
Only one full DNA profile was obtained from the
cartridges/cases during this experiment: |
|
The bloody print off the 9mmP aluminum cartridge |
|
Cartridge had not been fired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two partial DNA profiles were obtained: |
|
The bloody print from the 45ACP aluminum
cartridge case |
|
Cartridge had not been fired |
|
The bloody print from the 45ACP aluminum
cartridge case |
|
Cartridge HAD been fired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only DNA that survived on cartridges/cases
processed for fingerprints was DNA from bloody prints. |
|
No DNA profiles were obtained from any of the
sweat or oily prints. |
|
3/16 cartridges/cases with bloody prints gave a
full or partial DNA profile. |
|
One of these cartridges had been fired through
.45 pistol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not likely |
|
If you eliminate bloody prints from
consideration, then no DNA profiles were obtained. |
|
|
|